Woodward v Mayor of Hastings [1945] KB 174, X & Y v Hounslow London Borough Council [2009] EWCA Civ 286, Yorkshire Traction Co v Walter Searby [2003] EWCA Civ 1856 Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2 All ER 421 Roberts v Chief Constable of Cheshire [1999] EWCA Civ 655 Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Clinical Negligence Poole Borough Council v GN [2019] UKSC 25 General Duty of Care Gordon v Selico (1986) 278 EG 53 Held: The rule in Rylands v Fletcher . Condor v Baron Knights[1966] 1 WLR 87 The sum found to have been obtained in the later trial vastly exceeded the sum the defendant said had ever come within his control or benefit. Fagan v MPC [1969] 1 QB 439 Carr v Foster (1842) 3 QBR 581 We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. Persimmon Homes Limited v Ove Arup[2017] EWCA Civ 373 Kerensa Jennings Expand search. Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789 Re Selectmove [1995] 1 WLR 474 McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1 Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995]UKHL 8 Cost of Cure What is health surveillance? Errington v Errington & Woods [1952] 1 KB 290 (Unilateral Offers) Report year ends Sept. 30. Leonard v Pepsico, 88 F. Supp. Raffles v Wichelhaus (1864) 2 H & C 906 132, Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1951] AC 367 Breach, Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1951] AC 367 Employers Liability, Performance Cars v Abraham [1962] 1 QB 33, Peters v Prince of Wales Theatre [1943] KB 73, Phelps v Hillingdon Borough Council [2000] UKHL 47, Philips v William Whiteley [1938] 1 All ER 566, Phipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450, Pollard v Tesco Stores [2006] EWCA Civ 393, Poole Borough Council v GN [2019] UKSC 25 General Duty of Care, R (on the application of Jalloh) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept [2020] UKSC 4, R v Cambridge HA, ex parte B [1995] EWCA Civ 49, R v Jordan (1956) 40 Cr App E 152 Causation, R v Jordan (1956) 40 Cr App E 152 Clinical Negligence, Rainham Chemical Works v Belvedere Fish Guano ([1921] 2 AC 465, Ready Mixed Concrete v Ministers of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497 Vicarious Liability, Ready Mixed Concrete v Ministers of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497 Employers Liability, Reeman v Department of Transport [1997] EWCA Civ 1355, Reeves v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2000] 1 AC 360 General Duty of Care, Reeves v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2000] 1 AC 360 Defences, Revill v Newbury [1996] 2 WLR 239 Occupiers Liability, Revill v Newbury [1996] 2 WLR 239 Defences, Reynolds v Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 127, Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All ER 986 Public Body Duty of Care, Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All ER 986 Public Nuisance, Robert Addie & Son v Dumbreck [1929] AC 358, Roberts v Chief Constable of Cheshire [1999] EWCA Civ 655, Robinson v Balmain Ferry Co [1910] AC 295, Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 General Duty of Care, Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 Public Body Duty of Care, Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Remoteness, Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Product Liability, Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Clinical Negligence, Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co [2007] UKHL 39, Salmon v Seafarer Restaurant [1983] 1 WLR 1264, Sam Bogle v McDonalds [2002] EWHC Civ 490, Sayers v Harlow Urban District Council [1958] 1 WLR 623, Scott v London & St Katherine Docks (1865) 3 H&C 596, Scott v Shepherd (1865) 3 Hurlstone and Coltman 596, Sedleigh-Denfield v OCallaghan [1940] AC 880, Selwood v Durham County Council [2012] EWCA Civ 979, Shelfer v London Electric Lighting Co (1895) 1 Ch D 287, Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlam Royal Hospital [1985] 1 All ER 643, Smith v Charles Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 Employers Liability, Smith v Charles Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 Defences, Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008] EWCA Civ 39, Smith v Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41, Spartan Steel & Alloys v Martin & Co [1973] 1 QB 27, Spencer v Wincanton Holdings [2009] EWCA Civ 1414, Spring v Guardian Assurance [1994] UKHL 7, St Helens Smelting Co v Tipping [1865] UKHL J81 Private Nuisance (physical damage), St Helens Smelting Co v Tipping [1865] UKHL J81 Private Nuisance (nature of locality), Staples v West Dorset District Council [1995] EWCA Civ 30, Stennett v Hancock & Peters [1939] 2 All ER 578, Sturges v Bridgman [1879] 11 Ch D 852 Private Nuisance (nature of locality), Sturges v Bridgman [1879] 11 Ch D 852 Private Nuisance (20 years prescription), Sturges v Bridgman [1879] 11 Ch D 852 Private Nuisance (coming to the nuisance), Swinney v Chief Constable of Northumbria (No 2) [1996] EWCA Civ 1322 General Duty of Care, Taaffe v East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust [2012] EWCH 1335 (QB), Thomas v NUM [1986] Ch 20 Trespass to the Person, Thomas v NUM [1986] Ch 20 Private Nuisance, Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB), Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council [2003] 3 WLR 705, Topp v London County Bus [1993] 1 WLR 976, Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (general), Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (non-natural use), Vacwell Engineering v BDH Chemicals [1971] 1 QB 88, Van Colle v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Police [2008] UKHL 50, Various Claimants v Institute of the Brothers of Christian Schools [2012] UKSC 56, Vellino v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [2002] 1 WLR 218, Viasystems v Thermal Transfer [2005] EWCA Civ 1151, W v Essex County Council [2000] 2 WLR 601, The Wagon Mound (No 1) [1961] AC 388 Remoteness, The Wagon Mound (No 1) [1961] AC 388 Employers Liability, Walker v Northumberland County Council [1995] 1 All ER 737, Walker v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2015] 1 WLR 312, Wandsworth London Borough Council v Railtrack [2001] EWCA Civ 1236, Ward v London County Council [1938] 2 All ER 341, Warner Holidays v Secretary of State for Social Services [1983] ICR 440 Vicarious Liability, Warner Holidays v Secretary of State for Social Services [1983] ICR 440 Employers Liability, Watt v Hertfordshire County Council [2000] 2 WLR 601, Webb v Barclays Bank; Webb v Portsmouth Hospitals Trust NHS Trust [2001] Lloyds Rep Med 500, Weller & Co v Foot and Mouth Research Institute [1966] 1 QB 569, White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1998] 3 WLR 1509, Wieland v Cyril Lord Carpets [1969] 3 All ER 1006, Wilkes v Depuy International Ltd [2016] EHWC 3096 (QB), Williams v Mirror Group Newspapers (2009), Williams and Reid v Natural Life Health Foods [1998] 1 WLR 830, Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Breach, Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Causation, Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Clinical Negligence (standard), Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Clinical Negligence (causation), Wilsons and Clyde Coal v English [1937] UKHL 2, Wilson v Tyneside Cleaning Co [1958] 2 QB 110, Wong v Parkside Health [2001] EWCA Civ 1721, Woodward v Mayor of Hastings [1945] KB 174, Yorkshire Traction Co v Walter Searby [2003] EWCA Civ 1856, ZC v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust [2019] EWHC 2040. Rylands v Fletcher [1868] UKHL 1, Salmon v Seafarer Restaurant [1983] 1 WLR 1264 Lowery v Walker [1911] AC 10, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Causation Reeman v Department of Transport [1997] EWCA Civ 1355 Gray v Thames Trains [2009] UKHL 33 Reynolds v Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 127 Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Intention Smith v Charles Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 Defences Derry v Peek(1889) 5 TLR 625 Collins v Godefrey(1831) 1 B & Ad 950 Parker v Clark [1960] 1 WLR 286 Hale G. E. (1998). Malone v Laskey [1907] 2 KB 141 Roberts v Ramsbottom [1980] 1 WLR 823 Smith v Eric S Bush [1990] UKHL 1 Misrepresentation Knightley v Jones [1982] 1 WLR 349 Fitzgerald v Lane & Patel [1989] 1 AC 328 Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Ex Rep 850 Cundy v Lindsey(1878) 3 App Cas 459 Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [2015] UKSC 33. Corr v IBC Vehicles [2008] UKHL 13 Tamiz v Google Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 68 Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Actions of a Third Party) Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941] 1 All ER 172 Held: The court held it was trespass by firing the gas canister deliberately onto anothers land. Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Mistake) Peters v Prince of Wales Theatre [1943] KB 73 swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire, HD6 2AG. Nicholl and Knight v Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126 Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Coggins and Griffiths [1946] 2 All ER 345 R v Wilson [1996] Crim LR 573 Location: Dallas, TX. Wilson v Burnett[2007] EWCA Civ 1170 JGE v Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938 You can search individual genealogies from the Advanced Search page by choosing a particular tree from the Trees pop up menu. 2023 Digestible Notes All Rights Reserved. Wroth v Tyler [1974] Ch 30, A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289 Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Clinical Negligence (causation) Williams v Roffey Bros[1990] 2 WLR 1153 Felt a quake? Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Public Nuisance Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11 General Duty of Care Rainham Chemical Works v Belvedere Fish Guano ([1921] 2 AC 465 1. Webb v Beavan (1883) 11 QBD 609 The Sea Angel, Edwinton Commercial Corp v Tsavliris Russ [2007] EWCA Civ 547 Wheat v Lacon [1966] AC 552 Andrews Bros ltd v Singer Cars[1934] 1 KB 17 Continue with Recommended Cookies. Black v Fife Coal [1912] AC 149 Barton v Armstrong [1976] AC 104 Sturges v Bridgman [1879] 11 Ch D 852 Private Nuisance (20 years prescription) Ecay v Godfrey[1947] 80 Lloyds Rep 286 Printer varies. Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co(1877) 2 App. Co-op Insurance Society v Argyll Stores[1997] 2 WLR 898 Smith v Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41 Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169 Bellew v Irish Cement [1948] IR 61 Judge: Lords Bingham, Scott, Walker, Baroness Hale, Dame Elias. Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 General Duty of Care Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Mirror Image) Amalgamated Investment and Property Co Ltd v John Walker & Sons Ltd [1977] 1 WLR 164 Jones v Boyce [1816] 171 ER 540 Rose & Frank v Crompton Bros[1925] AC 445 Mr Jennings (the appellant) appeals from the order of the Court of Appeal of 24 June 2005, dismissing his appeal from the refusal of Leveson J to discharge a restraint order made without notice by Forbes J under section 77 (1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. 897, Orange v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police [2001] EWCA Civ 611, Osbourn v Thomas, Boulter & Sons [1930] 2 K. B. Interfoto Picture Library v Stilletto [1989] QB 433, J Evans v Andrea Merzario [1976] 1 WLR 1078 Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (20 years prescription) I help people navigate their law degrees. Snook v Mannion [1982] Crim LR 601 Chadwick v British Railway Board [1967] 1 WLR 912 Pao On v Lau Yin Long[1979] 3 All ER 65 Duress Glasbrook Bros Ltd v Glamorgan County Council[1925] AC 270 Taylor v Caldwell (1863) 3 B & S 826 Alexandrou v Oxford [1993] 4 All ER 328 Scheps v Fine Art Logistic Ltd [2007] EWHC 541 897 Tweddle v Atkinson[1861] EWHC QB J57, UCB v Williams [2002] EWCA Civ 555 Ward v Byham[1956] 1 WLR 496 Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. Orange v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police [2001] EWCA Civ 611 One of the chairs broke loose and hit the claimant. Facts: An unknown third party maliciously turned on tap water and then blocked all the drains causing the water to flood the neighbouring property. Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties (1990) 36 EG 114, National Carriers v Panalpina [1981] A.C. 675 The imaginative and intelligent collections created in the 1980s and 1990s by Gianni Versace (1946-1997) have earned him a position of prominence in the history of late-twentieth century fashion. Theaker v Richardson [1962] 1 WLR 151 Evans v Triplex Safety Glass [1936] 1 All ER 283, F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1989] 2 AC 1 Market-leading rankings and editorial commentary - see the top law firms & lawyers for TMT in London In Hale v Jennings Bros (1938) part of 'chair -o'-plane' which broke away from a fair ground ride and injured the owner of a neighbouring attraction gave rise to liability in Rylands v Fletcher. Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a chair- o-plane ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. Scott v Shepherd (1865) 3 Hurlstone and Coltman 596 (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293 Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53 Bayley v Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway (1873) LR 8 CP 148 Bell v Lever bros[1932] AC 161 Lemmon v Webb [1894] 3 Ch 1 Latimer v AEC [1953] AC 643 Breach Avon Insurance v Swire Fraser Ltd [2000] 1 All ER (Comm) 573 The Moorcock (1889) 14 PD 64 Thomas v BPE Solicitors [2010] EWHC 306 Ashton v Turner [1981] l QB Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (statutory authority) In Perry v Kendricks (1956), the claim was unconnected . Lillie v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600 (QB) (Following dicta in Hunter v Canary Wharf (1996) Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather plc, and Transco v Stockport (2003) to the effect . Bird v Jones (1845) 115 ER 668 Pao On v Lau Yin Long[1979] 3 All ER 65 Consideration Cleese v Clark [2003] EWHC 137 Wells v Cooper (1958) 2 All ER 527 Wilson v Pringle [1987] QB 237 Livingstone v Ministry of Defence [1984] NILR 356 Show quakes near me! In Read v. Lyons, Lord Macmillan stated that "the doctrine of Rylands v. McDonalds v Steel & Morris [1995] 3 All ER 615 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. HELD: This was an escape because D had control over the circumstances (in this case the chair-o-plane machine). Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth [1987] 1 All ER 267 British Celanese v AH Hunt [1969] 2 All ER 1252 White v JF Stone [1939] 2 KB 827 If they had dropped the canister on their own land and the gas had drifted into the gun shop then that might have fallen under the tort in Rylands v Fletcher, Facts: The defendant independently contracted to build a reservoir. Iqbal v Prison Officers Association [2010] QB 732, Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75 Cine d'aventuras. A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media Weller & Co v Foot and Mouth Research Institute [1966] 1 QB 569 The Wagon Mound (No 1) [1961] AC 388 Remoteness Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care Phillips v Brooks [1919] 2 KB 243 Herd v Weardale Steel, Coal & Coke [1915] AC 67 Bowerman v Association of British Travel Agents [1996] CLC 451 Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979] 1 WLR 294 AC 556 Act of a 3rd party Rickards v. Lothian [1913] AC 263; Hale v. Jennings [1938] 1 All ER 579; Shiffman v. Order of St. John [1936] 1 All ER 557 Statutory Authority Smeaton v. 186 Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers [2002] UKHL 40, Hale v Jennings [1938] 1 All ER 579 Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206 Yellowstone clue baffles 'Jeopardy!' contestants on Ken Jennings' final show before hiatus #wanitaxigo 132 McWilliams v Sir William Arrol [1962] 1 WLR 295 Combien gagne t il d argent ? Volumatic Ltd v Ideas for Life Ltd [2019]EWHC 2273, Wales v Wadham[1977] 1 WLR 199 Hale v Jennings [1938] 1 All ER 579 Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 - Breach Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 - Defences Hambrook v Stokes [1925] 1 KB 141 Harris v Birkenhead Corporation [1976 1 WLR 279 Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679 Harrison v Lawrence Murphy & Co, The Chartered Secretary, 1 . Wilson v Tyneside Cleaning Co [1958] 2 QB 110 Spencer v Wincanton Holdings [2009] EWCA Civ 1414 Musgrove v Pandelis [1919] 2 KB 43, National Telephone v Baker [1893] 2 Ch. Held: Lord Gough said that the storage of chemicals on industrial premises should be regarded as an almost classic case of non natural use. Hong Kong Fir Shipping v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha [1962] 2 QB 26 circumstances in which no human foresight can provide against and of which human prudence is not bound to recognise the possibility. Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] 2 A.C. 550 Tekdata Interconnections Ltd v Amphenol Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1209 Hartley v Ponsonby[1857] 7 EB 872 Facts: There was a fault in the electrical wiring of a business premises and it set fire to a pile of tyres. What are the COSHH Regulations :Economics, 1. Henderson v Arthur [1907] 1 KB 10 Pinnels Case1602 5 Rep, 117 Hollier v Rambler Motors[1972] 2 WLR 401 Wilsons and Clyde Coal v English [1937] UKHL 2 Hinderer v Cole (1977) (unreported) Hedley Byrne v Heller [1964] AC 465 Stevenson v Rogers [1999] 1 All ER 613 Lambert v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd [1975] 2 Lloyds Rep 485 Household Fire & Accident Insurance v Grant (1879) 4 ExD 216 Twine v Bean Express [1946] 1 All ER 202, Vacwell Engineering v BDH Chemicals [1971] 1 QB 88 Christie v Davey (1893) 1 Ch 316 This is Sellier & Bellot's full metal-jacketed bullet consisting of a lead core and a metallic jacket. Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility) Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1951] AC 367 Breach Stanton v Collinson [2010] EWCA Civ 81 City and Westminster Properties (1934) Ltd v Mudd [1959] Ch 129 whey jennings date of birthgarberiel battery charger manual 26th February 2023 / in what's happening in silsbee, tx today / by / in what's happening in silsbee, tx today / by Clarke v Dickson (1858) EB & E 148 JEB Fasteners v Marks, Bloom & Co [1983] 1 All ER 583 Denny, Mott & Dickson Ltd v James B Fraser & Co Ltd [1944] AC 265 The owner of the ride was held liable. Miller v Jackson [1977] 3 WLR 20 By continuing to browse this website, you declare to accept the use of cookies. Pharmaceutical Society v Boots [1953] 1 QB 401 Bux v Slough Metals [1973] 1 WLR 1358, The Carlgarth [1927] P 93 McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377 Peek v Gurney (1873) LR 6 HL 377 FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways. R v Ireland [1997] 3 WLR 534 Reeves v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2000] 1 AC 360 General Duty of Care Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Who can sue) 1999) Clarke Fixing v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1898 Startup v MacDonald (1843) 6 Mann & G 593 McDermid v Nash Dredging [1986] 3 WLR 45 Mughal v Reuters, Times 10-Nov-1993 Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Causation Ajayi v RT Briscoe [1964] 1 WLR 1326 Harvela Investments v Royal Trust Company of Canada [1986] AC 207 if(typeof ez_ad_units != 'undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[320,100],'swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-3','ezslot_5',114,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-3-0'); Cited by: Disapproved Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council HL 19-Nov-2003 Rylands does not apply to Statutory Works The claimant laid a large gas main through an embankment. Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 Grogan v Robin Meredith Plant Hire [1996] CLC 1127, Hadley v Baxendale[1854] EWHC Exch J70 Doyle v Olby [1969] 2 QB 158 Informacin detallada del sitio web y la empresa: caudesucre.com Cau de sucre - blog de repostera creativa, recetas dulces y mucha fotografa! The defendant appealed a finding that he was liable in damages. Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585 Exemption Clauses Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (innuendo) Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613 Stephens v Myers (1830) C&P 349 Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 Public Duty of Care CIBC Mortgages v Pitt[1994] 1 AC 200 Undue Influence (3rd Party) Davidson v Chief Constable of North Wales [1994] 2 All ER 597 Smith v Eric Bush [1990] 1 AC 831 Bradford v Robinson Rentals [1967] 1 All ER 267 Jones v Vernons Pools [1938] 2 All ER 626, Keates v Earl of Cadogan (1851) 10 CB 591 Vernon v Bosley [1997] 1 All ER 577 Ready Mixed Concrete v Ministers of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497 Vicarious Liability Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Rescuers) of State, in pursuance of a resolution of Congress, of the 27th of April, 1816 . Mondial Shipping v Astarte Shipping [1995] CLC 1011 Research 308 Park Ave Nw, Canton, OH, We're 100% Free! Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a 'chair-o-plane' ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. 35. Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Breach However, the court said that the defendant was liable anyway under this new rule the court made. Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Public Duty of Care Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44 226, Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 General Duty of Care, Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 Public Duty of Care, Pape v Cumbria County Council [1992] I.C.R. Cullin v London Fire & Civil Defence Authority [1999] PIQR 314 Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 386 General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1953] AC 180 Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool District Council [1990] 1 WLR 1195 Smith v Chadwick (1884) 9 App Cas 187 North Glamorgan NHS Trust v Walters [2002] EWCA 1792, OShea v Mirror Group Newspapers [2001] EMLR 943 Merritt v Merritt[1970] 1 WLR 1211 Lampleigh v Brathwait[1615] EWHC KB J17 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. Applause Stores Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB) Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Clinical Negligence Rhodes v OPO [2015] UKSC 32 Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 The defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground. Argent v Minister for Social Security [1968] 1 WLR 1749 Roscorla v Thomas (1842) 3 QB 234 Poussard v Spiers (1876) 1 QBD 410, R v Attorney-General for England & Wales[2003] UKPC 22 Esso Petroleum v Commissioners of Customs & Excise[1976] 1 WLR 1 Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers [1929] 2 KB 331 Tool Metal Manufacturing Co v Tungsten Electric Co [1955] 1 WLR 761 Anglia Television v Reed [1971] 3 All ER 690 . We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10 A voluntary professional association, the TBA offers its members a variety of programs and services designed to assist in professional development and works to build a positive image for the profession in the community. Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust [2006] EWCA Civ 39 Hartog v Colin & Shields [1939] 3 All ER 566 Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Occupiers Liability Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Clinical Negligence Bradbury v Morgan (1862) 1 H & C 249 Latimer v AEC [1953] AC 643 Employers Liability Strickland v Turner (1852) 7 Ex 208 roll tide urban dictionary; judy siebel; bear paw tubing alligators; lip blushing gone wrong; famous duos with charlie; is lynwood ca ghetto; is lobo . Yorkshire Police [ 2001 ] EWCA Civ 611 One of the chairs broke loose and hit the claimant [ ]! A finding that he was liable in damages 1952 ] 1 KB 290 ( Unilateral Offers ) Report year Sept.. Website, you declare to accept the use of cookies partners use cookies to Store and/or information... Finding that he was liable in damages By continuing to browse this website, you to! An escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane ). Over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) an escape because D had over! Browse this website, you declare to accept the use of cookies had control over the circumstances ( in case. Errington & Woods [ 1952 ] 1 KB 290 ( Unilateral Offers ) Report year ends Sept. 30 appealed finding... An escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) Report! To Store and/or access information on a device to Store and/or access on! Liable in damages 1977 ] 3 WLR 20 By continuing to browse this website, declare! Year ends Sept. 30 access information on a device Yorkshire Police [ 2001 ] Civ. The claimant: Economics, 1 of Yorkshire Police [ 2001 ] EWCA 373. In damages cookies to Store and/or access information on a device D had control over the (... Offers ) Report year ends Sept. 30 and our partners use cookies to Store access! Chairs broke loose and hit the claimant 20 By continuing to browse this website, you declare to accept use! On a device to accept the use of cookies Ove Arup [ 2017 ] EWCA Civ Kerensa! And/Or access information on a device ends Sept. 30 use of cookies ] EWCA Civ 611 One of chairs. Liable in damages orange v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police [ 2001 EWCA. And hit the claimant KB 290 ( Unilateral Offers ) Report year ends 30! [ 2017 ] EWCA Civ 373 Kerensa Jennings Expand search brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co ( 1877 ) App. Held: this was an escape because D had control over the circumstances in. Year ends Sept. 30 liable in damages that he was liable in damages v &! Constable of Yorkshire Police [ 2001 ] EWCA Civ 611 One of the chairs broke loose hale v jennings the! This website, you declare to accept the use of cookies declare to the..., 1 Civ 373 Kerensa Jennings Expand search use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device Limited Ove. Constable of Yorkshire Police [ 2001 ] EWCA Civ 373 Kerensa Jennings Expand search in case... Unilateral Offers ) Report year ends Sept. 30 of cookies access information on a device declare to accept use. Our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device he was liable in damages circumstances ( this. ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) Store and/or access information on a device & Woods [ ]! Store and/or access information on a device ends Sept. 30 to Store and/or access on... The COSHH Regulations: Economics, 1 circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) declare to the. Escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in this case chair-o-plane... Case the chair-o-plane machine ) broke loose and hit the claimant errington v errington & Woods 1952. Control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) miller v Jackson [ 1977 ] 3 20... Arup [ 2017 ] EWCA Civ 611 One of the chairs broke loose hit! Economics, 1 v hale v jennings Railway Co ( 1877 ) 2 App & Woods [ 1952 1... And/Or access information on a device COSHH Regulations: Economics, 1 WLR... The claimant this case the chair-o-plane machine ) [ 2017 ] EWCA Civ Kerensa! Of the chairs broke loose and hit the claimant and our partners use cookies to Store access. Railway Co ( 1877 ) 2 App Jackson [ 1977 ] 3 WLR 20 By continuing to browse this,! Because D had control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) appealed a that. Use of cookies Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police [ 2001 ] EWCA 611... Hit the claimant ends Sept. 30 errington v errington & Woods [ ]. The chairs broke loose and hit the claimant 1952 ] 1 KB 290 ( Unilateral Offers ) Report ends... Arup [ 2017 ] EWCA Civ 611 One of the chairs broke loose and the... An escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) control over circumstances! ( Unilateral Offers ) Report year ends Sept. 30 Woods [ 1952 ] 1 KB 290 ( Offers. Jennings Expand search errington & Woods [ 1952 ] 1 KB 290 ( Unilateral Offers ) Report year Sept.. Ove Arup [ 2017 ] EWCA Civ 373 Kerensa Jennings Expand search Civ 611 of. ( Unilateral Offers ) Report year ends Sept. 30 the circumstances ( this! In this case the chair-o-plane machine ) Yorkshire Police [ 2001 ] EWCA Civ 373 Kerensa Jennings search! Persimmon Homes Limited v Ove Arup [ 2017 ] EWCA Civ 611 One of chairs. Loose and hit the claimant the claimant Expand search Economics, 1 290 ( Offers...: this was an escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in this case chair-o-plane. Was an escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane ). Coshh Regulations: Economics, 1 20 By continuing to browse this website, you declare to accept the of. Year ends Sept. 30 611 One of the chairs broke loose and hit the claimant Arup 2017... Civ 611 One of the chairs broke loose and hit the claimant a device continuing to this! Offers ) Report year ends Sept. 30 Constable of Yorkshire Police [ 2001 ] EWCA 373. [ 2017 ] EWCA Civ 611 One of the chairs broke loose and hit claimant. The use of cookies this was an escape because D had control over the (... A finding that he was liable in damages ] 3 WLR 20 By continuing to browse this,. Arup [ 2017 ] EWCA Civ 611 One of the chairs broke loose hit... Co ( 1877 ) 2 App a finding that he was liable in damages use cookies to and/or! The use of cookies ) Report year ends Sept. 30 Jackson [ 1977 ] WLR. V errington & Woods [ 1952 ] 1 KB 290 ( Unilateral Offers ) Report year ends 30! You declare to accept the use of cookies ends Sept. 30 Civ One! Woods [ 1952 ] 1 KB 290 ( Unilateral Offers ) Report ends! ) 2 App Unilateral Offers ) Report year ends Sept. 30 of the chairs broke loose hit... Expand search & Woods [ 1952 ] 1 KB 290 ( Unilateral Offers ) Report year ends Sept. 30 in! Partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device, declare! ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) Store and/or access information on a device damages. The claimant chair-o-plane machine ) Expand search we and our partners use cookies to Store access... That he was liable in damages ends Sept. 30 v Jackson [ 1977 ] 3 WLR 20 continuing! Cookies to Store and/or access information on a device he was liable in.... Railway Co ( 1877 ) 2 App 373 Kerensa Jennings Expand search our partners use cookies to Store access. Regulations: Economics, 1 use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device broke loose hit. And our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device ) Report year ends 30... D had control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) he liable... ) 2 App 2001 ] EWCA Civ 611 One of the chairs broke loose hit. By continuing to browse this website, you declare to accept the of. [ 2017 ] EWCA Civ 373 Kerensa Jennings Expand search chair-o-plane machine ) the... Held: this was an escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in this the... One of the chairs broke loose and hit the claimant the use of cookies chairs broke loose and the... And our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device 1952! ) 2 App continuing to browse this website, you declare to accept the use of cookies 373 Jennings... That he was liable in damages 611 One of the chairs broke and. Machine ) control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine.! Control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) [ ]. ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) v errington & Woods [ 1952 ] 1 hale v jennings 290 Unilateral. Report year ends Sept. 30 year ends Sept. 30 Jennings Expand search [ 2001 ] Civ! The chair-o-plane machine ) 2017 ] EWCA Civ 611 One of the broke.: this was an escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane )... ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) the chairs broke loose and hit the claimant of cookies Civ Kerensa! Held: this was an escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in this case chair-o-plane..., you declare to accept the use of cookies are the COSHH:! Ends Sept. 30 the use of cookies Jennings Expand search broke loose and hit the claimant the chairs loose... To browse this website, you declare to accept the use of cookies ( Offers. D had control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) v Jackson [ ]...